Google stated that, “It’s become clear that in the current environment, ATEAC can’t function as we wanted. So we’re ending the council and going back to the drawing board.” It seems clear that Google didn’t know what they wanted their ethics board to be from the beginning. It seems they didn’t want an oversight committee as much as a shield from attacks from both liberals and conservatives. It didn’t work.
Ethics and bigotry don’t mix, and Google could have appointed a conservative that wasn’t so hateful. Instead, they tried to appeal to those on the far right, making the group less about ethics and more about ensuring they could do whatever they want with AI.
Thousands of Google employees signed a petition to remove the transphobic James form Google’s board. Other members left the board over the other appointees, including one who ran a drone company. All members of the board were independently wealthy enough to accept an unpaid job. The entire concept was flawed from the start, but it couldn’t even stay together for an entire week.