Who’s Suing Google?
In This Article:
Tim Chevalier
Tim has publicly identified himself as queer, transgender, and disabled. He was one of many people offended by James Damore’s memo, and noticed Google’s inaction until the memo was made public. As you might imagine, internal message boards at Google were aflame with those siding with James Damore’s screed, or at least saying he shouldn’t be fired for his sexist, racists beliefs, and those who were obviously happy Google finally got rid of him. Tim took part in those discussions, explaining to Googlers who supported Damore why they were both wrong and displaying racism and sexism by implying that Google had to “lower the bar” to hire minorities and women. Tim became a keyboard warrior at Google against discrimination, something the company itself should have been doing.
Gina Scigliano, Google spokesperson, stated that Tim Chevalier was fired not due to retaliation for bringing the Damore memo to light, nor was he fired for speaking out against sexism, racism, and anti-LGBTQ bias at Google. Instead, she says he was fired for communicating in a way that was not “consistent with our policies.” She stated that “We always make our decision without any regard to the employee’s political views.” But is that inherently siding with James Damore, who has framed his sexism and racism as his personal “political views?”
It seems clear that Chevalier became frustrated with Google’s lack of action against the racist, sexist, and anti-LGBTQ comments he saw from his fellow Googlers, and spoke out about it in anger. He accused the “white boys” of Google of expecting privilege and feeling threatened when they don’t have an advantage over others. The idea is common: when you have privilege and power, equality can seem like oppression. Google says they fired Tim for making an uncomfortable work environment, but Tim believes that Google’s policies should protect marginalized groups, not those making Google unwelcome for women and minorities. If Google’s not doing enough to combat xenophobic hate speech at their company, should frustrated employees who step up and tackle it with perhaps too much fervor take the blame?
Loretta Lee
Loretta Lee was fired by Google in 2016 for poor performance. She states that her poor performance wasn’t actually due to her not working enough or her code being sub-par, but rather that she faced retaliation for speaking out against sexual harassment she faced in the office. To really help you understand how much power her coworkers had over her performance, you need to know a little about code reviews and source control management.
Think of code like a long paper you might write for a class. Let’s say you have a 20 page paper being worked on by a team of 5 people. The “master” version of the paper will sit online, and each team member will take a snapshot of it, change something, and send it out to their peers for review. If they like the changes, those changes are merged into the master version. This reduces conflicts (two people both working on page 17 of the paper, for example), and helps improve quality, by ensuring everyone has an editor.
Loretta’s supposedly poor performance, she says, only came about after she spoke out against the sexual harassment she faced at Google. People stopped reviewing her code, or started nitpicking it, claiming it was never good enough to be merged. As a result, it seemed as though Loretta’s performance was awful, but really, she claims, her male coworkers were sabotaging her in retaliation.
Lee claims she faced severe harassment at Google. She says she was pestered daily with Nerf darts (the office equivalent of flirtation through pulling a girl’s pigtails, I suppose). That alone would be annoying, especially if it was targeted, but it was the least of her complaints. She had her drinks spiked with liquor, was texted asking for a “horizontal hug,” had a male employee show up to her apartment with liquor and refuse to leave, had her breasts groped, was slapped by a male employee, and once found a man hiding under her desk, possibly trying to install a webcam to view up her skirt.
Loretta’s superior found out about the harassment, and pushed her to report it. However, she didn’t want to. Lee knew she would likely face retaliation if she spoke out about this constant sexual harassment. She, like many women, stayed quiet. However, one of her harassers, perhaps spurred by her refusals to accept their invitations, had her written up for being uncooperative. For Loretta Lee, that was the last straw. She finally came forward with her harassment complaints, but Google ignored her.
Class Action Suit and U.S. Department of Labor
A class action lawsuit was thrown out late last year for being too vague. It claimed Google had discriminated against all female employees, but a judge said it needed to be more specific. The lawsuit is being filed once again with more specific plaintiffs, the women whose careers were derailed by Google’s apparent sexism.
The U.S. Department of Labor has also been in a legal battle with Google. As Google is a federal contractor, the U.S. government has to do routine checks to ensure that Google is not engaging in discrimination. During their last check, they found women were being drastically underpaid at Google. The Department of Labor is currently trying to get their hands on historical data to prove that women are not given the same raises, bonuses, and advancement opportunities as men at Google. However, they think they already have good reason for concern.
James Damore and David Gudeman
Google’s Standing
Sources:
- Ethan Baron, Mercury News
- Department of Labor
- Paul Lewis, The Guardian
- Natasha Tiku, Wired
- Daniel Wiessner, Reuters
- Julia Carrie Wong, The Guardian